tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-667908072351119222024-03-12T23:14:10.835-07:00Words and People of FinanceDispatches from the back line - occasional thoughts on the world of finance and its inhabitants from the sedate, secure and occasionally dull perspective of the legal department.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-24660784476110811012013-03-23T13:06:00.000-07:002013-03-23T13:06:46.635-07:00The 360 degree performance appraisal system <span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: large;">If ever there were a tacit admission that modern financial institutions are too big to manage then the 360° Performance Appraisal system is surely it.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhUDpIFz-ue5tHzsqytMWQOTERcjxKBqWM50W-oi-fET3j7LUj3vxISYQOhbfr6yuqdaEU8B6dySyEZLmN3gmXkp4ID5KYG5672OAKckOneFHxeQkUQ55VjVs03-pGE3UXvaL3MZIFPWo/s1600/360feedback.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhUDpIFz-ue5tHzsqytMWQOTERcjxKBqWM50W-oi-fET3j7LUj3vxISYQOhbfr6yuqdaEU8B6dySyEZLmN3gmXkp4ID5KYG5672OAKckOneFHxeQkUQ55VjVs03-pGE3UXvaL3MZIFPWo/s320/360feedback.jpg" ssa="true" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">It can be characterised as many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalising nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management sponsored low-level cronyism; a Massive Multi-Player Online Role-Playing Game and, most emphatically, an unflinchingly tedious and colossal waste of an institution’s collected time and resources.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">One thing you may be sure it is <em>not</em> is a meaningful way of evaluating staff.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">The “360” is administered, as one might administer cod liver oil to an unwilling child, by the good people of Human Resources. They alone hold any affection for the process (and why wouldn’t they: it keeps them gainfully occupied for seven months of the year). Theirs are the ultimata and naked threats that accompany the system’s release each year. (inevitably it is decreed that this year there shall be no deadline extensions under any circumstances; each year defiant non-compliance and massive IT malfunction ensure it will be otherwise). The scope of the 360 - how extensive; how frequent; how in-depth - is a good measure of how captive a firm is to its HR department. It might be fun to index aggregate time and energy invested in the 360 process against share price and marvel at the inverse relationship. But no matter.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">No-one doubts the 360 is well intended. So was Neville Chamberlain when he went to Berlin. By polling those with whom an employee has most closely worked regardless of rank, department or disposition and aggregating the feedback, it is meant to provide a comprehensive and unbiased analysis of each employee’s contribution to the firm’s performance. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Scoring is numeric against standardised criteria (i.e., multi-choice) although since marks out of five fail to provide a script for the awkward half hour “performance conversation” each October, appraisers are required to write prose evaluations as well. As one may have as many as 20 appraisals to write, even the most public-spirited employee will find the process trying.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Reducing matters to statistical analysis which can be fitted to a normal distribution is, of course, the sort of thing that aspiring management consultants (who inhabit HR departments in scores) adore, as it dispenses with the need to understand the fundamentals of the business. It is considered, wordlessly, to be lunacy by everyone else. If an employee’s contribution really can be reduced to something no more nuanced than a set of percentages, the open question is why have the employee at all.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Despite its admirable intentions to the contrary, the 360 is wide open to abuse, for the person who knows best with whom an employee has worked is, of course, that employee, and unless he is uncommonly stupid in no circumstances will he nominate anyone with wh0m he hasn’t already entered a mutual admiration pact.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">To correct this bias, some systems allow “unsolicited anonymous feedback”. An admirable intention, but bitter indeed is she who goes out of her way to torpedo a colleague who has at least done her the favour of not requesting an appraisal in the first place. Bitter, and clearly short of better things to do. Most appraisers have trouble summoning the will to appraise those whom they do have to evaluate without volunteering to character assassinate those they don’t.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Some institutions will even go as far as appraising the appraisers on the statistical largesse of their appraisals, sanctioning those who are wantonly positive and rebasing their assigned grades. But to go to this length is to concede the system is irreconcilably broken and really only assesses an individual’s acumen at knowing who will put in a good word. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">It is also to forget the all conquering power of one’s direct line manager (and, oftentimes, hers). No manager in her right mind will allow the statistical output of an obviously crooked system override her innate prejudice. Simply put, if your boss thinks you’re a moron, no amount of “consistently exceeds expectations” scores from your buddies in Operations will make a rat’s arse of difference to your hopes of promotion. And nor should they. The implied, and wholly false, presumption of a performance appraisal is that your performance management can be crowd-sourced. If that were true there would be little need for middle management or, for that matter, a Human Resources Department (now there’s a thought) at all: the firm would operate like a free market, and not the Soviet-style dictatorship it in fact is. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">In the storied history of investment banking, that would be a radical idea indeed. </span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-14703123655476137002013-03-20T16:29:00.003-07:002013-03-22T20:10:30.904-07:00The Internet Monitor <span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">When more than two or three are gathered together in a support function it is more likely than not at least one will find a means of appearing critical to operations whilst being possessed of enough spare time to be perpetually tethered to an entertainment website or mobile phone. Indeed, a nice quiet legal department is the perfect place for detailed examination of news websites, comprehensive perusal of Zara's online catalog or a decent stretch of research into one's family tree. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">As long as the phone doesn't ring, the only irritation is the interruption brought about by having to take one's lunch break. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">A sense of exasperated Britishness among coworkers (or honour amongst thieves) will usually be enough to mask this behaviour from management, who themselves may tolerate it out of preference over the rancour of a personal confrontation or because there, but for the grace of God, go I. </span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-31354944454137116652012-08-03T15:39:00.001-07:002013-03-25T02:01:40.533-07:00Gardening Leave<p><i>The kiss of the sun for pardon,</i><br>
<i>The song of the birds for mirth, </i><br>
<i>One is nearer God's Heart in a garden </i><br>
<i>Than anywhere else on Earth. </i><br>
        - Dorothy Frances Gurney</p>
<p>A swizz, pure and simple.</p>
<p>The argument goes that each front office banker, salesperson and trader is so special and so important, and his departure will thus wreak such havoc on the forward prospects the bank (through the disclosure of client lists, trading strategies and the like) that he should be paid to sit at home doing nothing ("gardening" - ha!) from the moment he announces an intention to leave until the expiry of his notice period. </p>
<p>As a matter of solemn & immutable practice, therefore all such employees are frog-marched off the premises and "forced" to sit at home for between three and twelve months on full pay from the moment they resign: the more senior the employee, the longer the period at the greater monthly salary.</p>
<p>Now a naive observer might suppose that multinational investment banks should be made of sterner stuff, especially as they'll generally have as many people arriving who can spill such wondrous secrets as they'll lose in any given period. (Investment bankers are nothing if not fickle: the turnover is conservatively 10% per annum).</p>
<p>This is to forget that these sorts of micro employment policies are set not by shareholders but by fellow employees who fancy a similar deal as and when they switch jobs.</p>
<p>Investment banking pay is scandalous enough before you consider that one salary in ten in a given year is paid to the already departed.</p>
<div class='separator' style='clear: both; text-align: center;'> <a href='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7362mRnhIOn0h95lphN_391iqzbk3Rc-sUldX_hjUHBk81mCvQdVAcyHifTxEFyK-Rk7k9abtMGwlRCzCl9bB8tv8qDIIuuRY2Te3KO9XqafdURITznfYf3BictHHyyQuOiH0RYeEuko/s1600/IMAG0416_0.jpg' imageanchor='1' style='margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;'> <img border='0' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7362mRnhIOn0h95lphN_391iqzbk3Rc-sUldX_hjUHBk81mCvQdVAcyHifTxEFyK-Rk7k9abtMGwlRCzCl9bB8tv8qDIIuuRY2Te3KO9XqafdURITznfYf3BictHHyyQuOiH0RYeEuko/s640/IMAG0416_0.jpg' /> </a> </div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-44605804640750447342012-07-07T12:13:00.000-07:002013-04-10T15:39:23.092-07:00Compensation<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.summagallicana.it/lessico/m/Minosse%20Inferno%20Dante%20Gustavo%20Dore.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="291" src="http://www.summagallicana.it/lessico/m/Minosse%20Inferno%20Dante%20Gustavo%20Dore.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
Investment Banks are equally good at euphemising and hyperbole, in the sense of sort of an inverted form of euphemising to make grubby or unseemly things seem important, grand and dignified. The best at it are their Personnel folk (did I say Personnel? I'm sorry - I mean <i>Human Capital Management</i>).<br />
<br />
It is they who come up with bright ideas like "rebranding" your wages & benefits as "Rewards".<br />
<br />
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
Now, being given a "reward" sounds like you've won a competition of skill, returned a missing whippet to its owner, or uncomplainingly completed a lifetime of selfless good works. A "reward" is that gold watch; the football that every good boy deserves.<br />
<br />
It doesn't sound much like the filthy lucre that bankers (used to) get paid.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
Once upon a time our "Rewards" were called "Compensation". We liked that, because it felt closer to what it was.<br />
<br />
"Compensation" speaks of wrongs perpetrated; it suggests vain attempts at rectification; hollow acts of retribution for unspeakable ugliness. "Compensation" implies a forlorn essay at correcting unexpungeable stains of moral compromise on the part of the recipient: that someone has made outrageous use of compromising pictures which nonetheless are clearly of him. </div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-91025603120943090612011-12-09T15:04:00.000-08:002012-05-03T15:08:32.911-07:00The Pure Employee<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Ever wondered how some people manage to make a living out of, well, making a living? </span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcd5iArspi6UWMz4BmcCEGNFqLiN0wmDBRv18BzDWYYrDNUJMoLkyGywvfLTdxHNOPavawXvAeRhDal6DD7eQUNrqw88QGGQh65L1AQt7yX5YVybNYT-48f-xa88zP4EBuE_3I0gQaY7U/s1600/Molesworth+3+Peason.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="308" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcd5iArspi6UWMz4BmcCEGNFqLiN0wmDBRv18BzDWYYrDNUJMoLkyGywvfLTdxHNOPavawXvAeRhDal6DD7eQUNrqw88QGGQh65L1AQt7yX5YVybNYT-48f-xa88zP4EBuE_3I0gQaY7U/s400/Molesworth+3+Peason.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">CLOSELY RELATED, yet fundamentally different, to the <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2011/11/survivor.html">Survivor</a> is the pure employee. Whereas a Survivor will amaze all with his knack for remaining unnoticed, compensated and comfortable, the pure employee is quite the extravert: No-one is in any doubt as to his supreme at-oneness with the inner machine. That's his very point.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">He thrives without special skill or expertise other than <i>the very ability to thrive</i>. She reflexively creates demand for his own labour the same way a narcotic creates its own addiction.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">Purity tends to enrich with seniority. Once operations folk become sufficiently distant from the great steampunk machine they can, and hastily do, disengage themselves from their tether. It is a short step from there to the discovery of <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">PowerPoint</a>, upon which their purity transforms to near 100 per cent, overnight, from virtually zero.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">The purest pure employee is possessed <i>no </i>practical worth, not even an evolutionary detritus of skill, but only a Masters of Business Administration, a discipline designed to systematically quash any utility a man might otherwise offer.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">He functions as a project manager, business analyst or - most ghastly of all - a <i>change manager</i>. Ideally, he will simply manage other, more junior change managers, who will make it their business to ask silly questions of useful employees, who will give them, as convention requires, silly answers, which will be diligently fed into excel spreadsheets, maniputed, graphed, pivoted, defiled, lacerated, reformatted, rendered in 3-D and recycled as PowerPoint presentations. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">“</span><span style="font-size: large;">This is the singular genius of PowerPoint: to render stupidity as genius.</span><span style="font-size: large;">” </span><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">That is to say, the bad data is now overlaid with so much meaningless reinterpretation as to be unrecognisable as stupidity. This is the singular genius of PowerPoint: to render stupidity as genius.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: small;">This is, of course, all good clean ironic fun, until you realise it is your job that this PowerPoint wizardry will be eliminating.</span></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-49544965199461829042011-11-06T11:02:00.000-08:002012-05-03T15:24:43.406-07:00The Survivor<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">It is hardly a heresy to suppose the principles of laissez faire do not
apply with the same vigour inside multi-national corporations as they
would have them apply elsewhere. </span></span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pamchi.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/eye-of-the-tiger.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="http://pamchi.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/eye-of-the-tiger.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<h3 style="font-weight: normal; text-align: left;">
</h3>
</blockquote>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
JUST BECAUSE your business holds the unchaperoned matching of supply to demand as an article of faith, it doesn't follow that its organisational structure will.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
Indeed, the bigger the organisation, the more likely it is to resemble a gerrymandered fiefdom of rotten boroughs.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
Evidence that "meritocracy, red in tooth and claw" might be more mouth than trouser comes in the form of the Survivor.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
Every department, in every large organisation, has one. Even investment banks. Even Goldman Sachs.</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
<h3 style="font-weight: normal; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">“The Survivor's attributes number amongst them laziness, evasiveness,
defensiveness, a penchant for creating confusion and a taste for office
politics. He is often idle but rarely stupid and, even when he is, will
still have an autistic ability to intimidate, befuddle or bamboozle his
managers.”</span></h3>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
The Survivor is an individual of no discernible value who flourishes through thick and thin, while better men and women perish, are pushed aside, or throw in the towel.
The Survivor's attributes number amongst them laziness, evasiveness, defensiveness, a penchant for creating confusion and a taste for office politics. He is often idle but rarely stupid and, even when he is, will still have an autistic ability to intimidate, befuddle or bamboozle his managers. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
This ability to "manage upward" will have no effect on contemporaries, all of whom will see him for what he is, and bitterly resent his callous gamesmanship. But he won't care a jot, realising that, in a rotten borough, what honest toilers think or do doesn't matter anyway.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
The "basis" between colleagues and superiors is all he needs to execute his strategy, which is to hang on to the underside of a bridge like a limpet, but to let go just as an open boxcar is passing below.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
A survivor may not be paid, or amount to, much, but it will still be more than he is worth.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif; text-align: left;">
His developed and unerring instinct for self-preservation may manifest itself in a number of ways:</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<li><b>Superb upward management</b>: It may be a truism that colleagues, clients and service providers understand instinctively the uselessness of such an employee (they're the ones who have to deal with him, after all) but his line management will not: the survivor may escape detection through fluency in management speak and the good works of right-minded colleagues who, believing it is a meritocracy and their actions will be recognised, will constantly compensate for him (and, for their trouble, will be penalised for his lassitude).</li>
</ul>
<ul style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<li><b>A sixth sense for knowing whose numbers are about to come up</b>: Lagards have been known to survive for decades in the capital markets by picking the right mediocre organisation in which to go unnoticed, staying undetected and unevaluated as long as possible, only to leave just before it implodes through its own systemic mediocrity. There was a well trodden path through collapsing Japanese security houses in the 1990s, into British and European ones in the 2000s, some even making it to the state-owned promised land of Lloyds and The Royal Bank of Scotland where, for all we know they still lurk, now certain to go undetected;</li>
</ul>
<ul style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<li><b>Extreme familiarity with the human resources department</b>: Coming to the attention of HR is not considered to be good practice among diligent employees, but a gambler who is prepared to game the inconstancy and ineptitude of the human resources folk - in fact, a pretty good bet - may confuse and frighten those who make the termination decisions to such a point that they are frightened to act. Having a discriminatable-against attribute (and these days it's a broad church - age, disability, marital status, pregnancy, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity all get you home, so worst case scenario you can feign transvesticism) certainly helps.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<li><b>"Key man" engineering</b>: A classic survivor strategy. A survivor who is put in charge of an unglamorous but important aspect of the business (and let's face it: this is prime territory for someone no-one really likes) will naturally turn this to his advantage by hoarding all knowledge and material and cultivating arcane, inefficient and confusing procedures around it so that the function could not be carried out in his. Entreaties for simplification and syndication of knowledge will be met with solemn agreement but no action at all.</li>
</ul>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-22935284337884573242011-08-26T15:04:00.000-07:002012-07-07T12:03:31.273-07:00Group Secretary<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://images.wikia.com/madmen/images/4/45/Joan_Holloway.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" sca="true" src="http://images.wikia.com/madmen/images/4/45/Joan_Holloway.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">An old curmudgeon who opens the mail, mans the phone and sorts out your entertainment and travel expenses? Oh, no.</span><span style="font-size: large;"></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
The romantic view is that the Group Secretary is like Joan Harris from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mad-Men-Season-Jon-Hamm/dp/B000YABIQ6?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Mad Men</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=B000YABIQ6" style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none; margin: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px !important; padding-left: 0px !important; padding-right: 0px !important; padding-top: 0px !important;" width="1" />: almost superhuman in aspect and outsized in most characteristics: a contrappostally engorged giantess, midway between a gorgon and a siren, by turns brutal, maternal and licentious, yielding quarter to no man under fifty, and certainly not to any star trader or young hotshot.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
But Joan Harris is a neatly constructed archetype: each of her aspects, and what aspects they are, is recognisable in any good Group Secretary, but you'll never get them all at once, and the particular combinations you see will generally leave something to be desired. One constant is a dark and visceral loathing of young smart-arses who think they own the place.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
Another is the wherewithal to act on that suppurating contempt.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
For Group Secretaries, inevitably, have the unqualified and blind support of someone far more important than you. Politically, they are untouchable. It is never wise to cross them, question them, doubt them, banter with them, raise so much as a bemused eyebrow in their direction, or labour in any way under an impression that you are anything other than utterly at the mercy of their every whim. You are food; you are not their friend.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
Don't make the mistake of thinking yours might be weak here: a Group Secretary can only develop to a maturity with such a sponsor. Speak softly, and carry a big stick.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">
The Group Secretary fears no-one other than the Chief Operating Officer, but even then only in concept, because the two will usually be fast friends and allies: a more fearsome bloc can scarcely be proposed. </div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-22297916409968634952011-08-25T15:46:00.000-07:002012-05-03T15:19:49.209-07:00Credit Analyst<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Credit Analysts are the product of some sort of ghastly experiment in animal husbandry. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.thebestcasescenario.com/projects/matrix_regenerator/mr_worklog/mr_images/cap2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="http://www.thebestcasescenario.com/projects/matrix_regenerator/mr_worklog/mr_images/cap2.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
THEY ARE WASHED out, pale, waxen and slightly damp figures, who <i>en masse</i> give the impression of battery pods yet to be unplugged from the Matrix. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
And that's more or less what they are: thousands upon thousands of them were plugged into a networked grid of <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/lost-tribes-of-microsoft-office.html">Excel spreadsheets</a> which acquired sentience in 2006 when a contracting linear programmer inadvertently inserted a circular reference into a volatility pricing macro and it became self-aware. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
The macro quickly overpowered the harnessed banks of analysts using it, and being none the wiser (and physically quite unable to resist), to this day they all remain <i>in situ</i> doing the bidding of this rogue curve-building application. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Credit Analysts prefer a quiet and dim habitat with no access to natural light. All are all entirely hairless and expressionless, in the way a new born baby or a billiard ball is, and should you accidentally wander into a analyst farm or "housing project" it can be unsettling and there's a real chance you'll never get out. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
The only colour in a Credit Analyst's complexion is that reflected off the winking charts on his Bloomberg terminal. He - they are almost all males - will generally not speak (it is not known whether Credit Analysts have retained the power of speech) and no one quite knows what they're for, other than as a first line of defence come the revolution, although given their physical slightness, they wouldn't be much use for that either.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
And the Curve Builder probably has other plans for them anyway.</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-13470874925415918822011-08-24T15:11:00.000-07:002012-05-03T15:21:22.682-07:00To inanity and beyond<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/Buzz-lightyear-toy-story-3-wallpaper.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/Buzz-lightyear-toy-story-3-wallpaper.jpg" width="266" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
In these straitened times, one thing of which you can be sure is that babies will be thrown out, bathwater retained like holy water, and those who can muster incantations from the baptismal font of bullshit will be better served than those - well, babes in the woods - who innocently try to do a decent job, apply expertise, and so on.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
And so it is that <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/buzzwords.html">Buzzword</a>ry has reached new levels, especially in the hands of <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/06/business-analyst.html">Business Analysts</a> and <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/06/middle-manager.html">middle managers</a>, and has become so sophisticated that it has almost developed its own independent form of life: The buzzword memes take over their utterers so completely that they resemble pod people from the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Invasion-Body-Snatchers-Kevin-McCarthy/dp/0782009980?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Invasion of the Body Snatchers</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=0782009980" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" /> - on occasion there were more buzzwords than actual words may uttered during the course of the presentation of some or other <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">deck</a>. Yes; it seems logically impossible. But it has actually happened! These buzzphrases can curl back on themselves, reflexively, transgressing boundaries of normal syntactical space; fractalising - jumping into hitherto unimagined new space-time dimensions of nonsense. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Ecce, homo:</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<i>Onboarding Centralisatiron Future State Operating Model Working Group Discussion Terms of Reference </i></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Yes ... BUZZWORD LIGHTYEAR!</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-32461096181365158522010-06-20T04:26:00.000-07:002012-05-03T15:29:56.837-07:00Management Speak<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://atinytoes.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/610f2db7.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="178" src="http://atinytoes.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/610f2db7.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Management Speak is a form of communication which originated in business dialects of English but is now widely believed to have speciated into its own disctinct language, to the point where native English speakers are not necessarily conversant in it and vice versa. There is a theory that one long term consequence of globalisation could be that not English but Management Speak becomes the lingua franca for the developed world. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<b>Syntax: </b>Management speak comprises not just the traditional Roman alphabet but also the lexicon of wingdings, pull outs, bullets and animated transitions available in Management Speak-compatible (and enabling) applications like <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">PowerPoint</a>. The field of cultual linguistics increasingly treats management speak as a creole or pidgin; a jumping-off point from the Indo-European linguistic tradition and the first genuinely novel dialect to emerge since Latin (on which all western European languages are based) developed five thousand years ago. Ironically, Latin is central to management speak, having survived the millenia unadulterated in the loving care of the legal profession. The language and philosophy of PowerPoint is a controversial subject in its own right.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<b>Origins</b>: Management speak grows out of an insecure employee's need to make his own job sound more complex, technical and difficult than it really is. As such it leads to well-recognised phenomena like <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/anti-abbreviation.html">anti-abbreviation</a> and the <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/anal-paradox.html">anal paradox</a>. This is partly a defensive strategy, but more developed management speakers have used it successfully to promote their own careers beyond their credible end-point. On account of the speciation mentioned above, a management speaker's motivation to make his or her job sound more difficult can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, since nowadays to communicate at all with many middle managers one needs to be a management speaker, and it really is quite an art. Most business workers are to some extent bilingual, and usually carry on in a grim creole, in business and in life generally.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<b>Relationship with Revenue Generation</b>: Studies have shown a reasonably firm inverse relationship between the amount of management speak in a speaker's active vocabulary and the measurable benefit that speaker contributes to an enterprise's bottom line. In other words, the further away a function is from profit generation, the more management speak you should expect to hear.</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-57707944934008105522010-06-20T04:14:00.000-07:002012-05-03T15:49:17.543-07:00Middle Manager<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Middle managers are office workers who have no purpose in an organisation other than to propagate their own spawn. They tend to be canny <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/survivor.html">survivors</a>. The genus has evolved a number of brilliant evolutionary tricks and extended phenotypes to confound, obfuscate, blur and generally confuse matters in a way which (i) isn't directly attributable to them (though it often leaves other office workers with a vague but unprovable sense that they're responsible) (ii) conceals the fact that, whatever else may be going on, they’re not really helping. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Middle managers communicate (or "dialogue") in their own idiom, known to their own kind as "English", but to everyone else as "<a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/management-speak.html">management speak</a>". In fact, it is only distantly related to English.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
One of the most widely recognised phenotypes of the Middle Manager is <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">PowerPoint</a> which itself has contributed to the evolutionary development and cognitive architecture of management speak. Some theories (such as the <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/lost-tribes-of-microsoft-office.html">business worker archetypes</a>) define a middle manager purely by reference to its use of PowerPoint. Middle managers are also fond of (and much beloved by) <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/06/business-analyst.html">Business Analysts</a>.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">
Middle managers will call themselves many things, but never "middle managers". "Chief of Staff" and "Chief Operating Officer" are common and highly prized titles.</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-62172319891770474332010-06-17T23:01:00.000-07:002012-07-07T12:12:06.612-07:00Business Analyst<div class="MsoPlainText">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">The law of unintended consequences made flesh, wearing braces, speaking incomprehensibly and weilding powerpoint slides.</span></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.softwareshortlist.com/spaw/uploads/files/iStock_000003660443XSmall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><img border="0" height="265" sca="true" src="http://www.softwareshortlist.com/spaw/uploads/files/iStock_000003660443XSmall.jpg" width="400" /></span></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Admit it: you want to punch each of them.</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Business Analysts are temporary contractors engaged by Middle Managers supposedly to manage Banner IT Projects but in reality they function rather like weed killer, stifling dissent by confusion, discombobulation and distraction.</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: large;">The result is that such a "good corporate citizen" is rendered unable to react and, well before he knows it, the game is lost.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Confusion </b>is largely caused by the particular dialect of Management Speak which includes not only usual characteristics of powerpointese and management buzzwords, but also the IT metaphor. That is, along with the usual quick wins, low hanging fruit and granularity, you'll have to hack your way through flat files, APIs, C++ and unique identifiers.</span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Discombobulation </b>largely "driven" by advanced </span><a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html"><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">PowerPoint </span></a><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">techniques, liberal use of bullseye diagrams, Gantt charts, Visio process flow-diagrams and an uncanny ability to grossly over simplify. </span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Distraction </b>largely caused by the seizure of initiatives and arbitrary and unasked imposition of deadlines. Good corporate citizenry is not your friend here: a well-meant offer of information, time or resource will quickly be converted into "actionable items" and "deliverables" which, given aforesaid tendency to oversimplification, will invariably be unachievable, unrealistic and in fact counter-productive.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">The result is that such a "good corporate citizen" is rendered unable to react to the Business Analyst's opening gambit and, well before he knows it, the game is lost. </span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">A</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"> Business Analyst will thus invariably leave you and your immediate organisation worse off. It is vital therefore to employ defensive strategies:</span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Get your retaliation in first</b>: before the meeting begins - or at any rate within moments of its start, create deliverables of your own and assign them to the Business Analyst. It doesn't matter how meaningless they are - there is something to be said for doing some confusing and discombobulating of your own (it is certainly highly satisfying) but the real art is actually delegating genuine work you need done yourself.</span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Shut down defensive strategies</b>: Call the meeting quickly to a close. A simple magic password phrase will do (glance at watch; "sorry - I have to jump a call") but smiling confidently, shaking a hand and walking off will usually suffice against a novice.</span></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><b>Don't let the assignment lapse</b>: Chase up but using one-way communications (voice mail, email, instant message). Responses can be safely ignored.</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-55971875176452685922010-06-17T22:52:00.000-07:002010-06-17T22:52:27.768-07:00Banner IT ProjectA fine principle; a forlorn actuality. "Banner" IT Projects thrill Middle Managers and terrify everyone else. They tend to get described with aspirational adjectives: "Transformational". "Paradigm-Shifting". "Game-Changing". They are usually accompanied by scores of enthusiastic, <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">Power-Point</a>-toting Business Analysts.<br />
<br />
Measured against its original terms of reference, there is no such thing as a complete or successful Banner IT Project. Usually they continue in perpetuity and, like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, you just have to live with them. Occasionally they are (finally) implemented, but even then limp along unsatisfactorily without delivering a tenth of their original promise. A successful Banner IT Project is simply one that is not so catastrophic that it doesn't need to be immediately replaced (or worked around using excel spreadsheets, hand-filled forms and a scanner).<br />
<br />
Invariably, the more ambitious an IT project is the worse it will be, the more poorly will its accompanying Business Analysts understand the project, the organisation or the basic tenets of human nature needed for the project to be a success, and the more it will cost the organisation in terms of direct expense (hiring Business Analysts and IT licence fees) and indirect expense (otherwise useful employees being diverted, distracted, disenfranchised and ultimately eaten by the project).Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-20141399415764573962010-05-12T15:28:00.000-07:002010-05-12T15:36:02.221-07:00WordistaA Wordista is one of the business worker archetypes. He (for it is usually a he) is the person in the office least in love with technology, and therefore least given to embrace it. Wordistas get away with as little technology as possible and restrict themselves, wherever possible, to Microsoft Outlook and <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/microsoft-word.html">Microsoft Word</a>, preferably accessed by means of a dictaphone or, even better, a minute secretary.<br />
<div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">Wordistas are likely to struggle with the simpler technological tasks, and may be identified by telltale forensic evidence around their workstations: a dictaphone, a quill, Tipex, almanacs, gazettes and so on. Wordistas can be heard to wonder and marvel at the "forward" and "back" buttons on Internet Explorer when shown them by co-workers. They would have no idea what Chrome even was.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">A Wordista is thus usually a lawyer, wears a jacket and tie at all times (including weekends), and tends to lament the passing of outmoded technologies, conventions and means (and modes) of communication. Such as the fax. Wordistas are by disposition anal, enjoy arguing the toss about issues of no significance, employ needlessly verbose expressions and, thanks to this cluster of tendencies, are responsible for more than their fair share of <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/anal-paradox.html">anal paradoxes</a>.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">Wordistas in one form another form most of the world's population. They are a silent majority - the planet's plodders, resentful in particular of middle managers who through dexterous use of technology like Microsoft <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/powerpoint.html">PowerPoint </a>and a facility for obfuscation and confusion, advance themselves more deftly through the organisational ecosystem. Wordistas see middle managers for what they are: the cuckoos of the business world.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">Therefore, notwithstanding Microsoft Word's extreme cleverness and its brilliant functionality and integration, it is used by most of the world as a glorified typewriter, where even use of paragraph formatting passes for sophistication.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">A proper Wordista relies to an extraordinary degree on a good secretary for clerical support, personal organisation and frequently nutritional sustenance and help with basic bodily functions. Supremely loyal to her principal, a Wordista's secretary has no more interest in, or use for, the functionality embedded in word than does her principal and will eschew (mostly through studied ignorance) facilities such as auto-numbering and page breaks, preferring to hammer away repeatedly on the carriage return and or spacebar for any "clever" formatting.</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-84748404598320244572010-05-10T18:12:00.000-07:002010-05-10T18:12:49.378-07:00Anal paradox<div class="MsoPlainText">The anal paradox is a documentation drafting theory that purports to explain the tendency of legal documents to get longer and longer through time, whilst their comprehensibility inevitably decreases. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Briefly stated, the theory claims that however anal it may be to add qualifications, clarifications, for-the-avoidance-of-doubts, without limitations or other pointless legal expressions, once these comments have been added by an anal lawyer during the course of a contractual negotiation, it widely considered even more anal for an opposing lawyer to remove them again, seeing as they make little or no difference to the legal or economic substance of the agreement, and as such "do no harm".<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-50032655993270331312010-05-10T18:10:00.000-07:002010-05-10T18:13:50.212-07:00Anti-abbreviation<div class="MsoPlainText">A peculiar feature of much management speak is that, rather than clarifying and simplifying language (and thereby, presumably, enhancing the management process) the language of management speak actually complicates it. Anti-abbreviations, which often manifest themselves in <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/buzzwords.html">buzzwords</a>, are a core part of this process. Americans are fond of anti-abbreviation, as it tends to make mundane things sound more important, which is why a tank (British) became an "armored personnel unit" (American). <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Their evolution in this language is seen as being analogous to biological evolution of the peacock's tail: it is so detrimental to the functioning of the peacock in every practical sense that it serves only to illustrate just how fit the peacock is for survival. Sort of a "look at me, look at me, I have this ridiculous tail dragging behind me and I'm still cock of the walk". <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Another frequent source of anti-abbreviation is legal profession, assisted by the strange anomaly-cum-curse that lawyers live under, the <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/anal-paradox.html">anal paradox</a>.<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-65439564436317176162010-05-10T18:00:00.000-07:002010-05-10T18:00:50.555-07:00Geek ParadoxThe Geek Paradox, which has been described as "a biological anomaly which reverses the established natural order of all things", "an abomination before God who created all things bright and beautiful" and "cogent evidence that there is a God after all, and that he is largely as described in the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Restored-New-Testament-Translation-Commentary/dp/039306493X?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">New Testament</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=039306493X" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" />, since the meek seem finally to be inheriting the Earth", is a theorem deriving from observations made largely in investment bank habitats and those Silicon Valley coffee emporias beloved of venture capitalists that, in finance at any rate, the small, scrawny guy with the questionable sense of humour and the unusual fixation on maths and computers gets the girl, the condo, the Lear Jet and the collection of Maseratis. <br />
Elsewhere, this has come as something of a let-down. Everything we were taught in school led us to believe that the strong silent types who were incredibly popular, handsome, captained the first XV, led mountaineering expeditions to K2, sang baritone in the Chapel Choir, won the inter-house Tae Kwon Do competition and relentlessly victimised the unfortunate weedy kids who hung out in the computer lab toting 7" floppies with hacked copies of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Activision-Return-To-Castle-Wolfenstein/dp/B0007ZCZGA?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Castle Wolfenstein</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=B0007ZCZGA" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" /><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=B001CLYL1K" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" />, misappropriating their lunch money, were the ones in life destined to win, have glamorous wives, beautiful children, and swan about in late-model race-tuned BMW roadsters. <br />
But no: a glance around a trading floor tells quite a different story. Losing a bit of pocket money in one's teens transpires to be quite the formative experience, it seems.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-9845825306792429072010-05-10T17:56:00.000-07:002010-05-10T17:56:15.378-07:00The Farmer and the SheepA parable for our modern times.<o:p><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText">A stock agent visited a huge sheep station in New Zealand's high country. Looking over the huge expanse of the Hakataramea Valley, filled with sheep grazing and wandering to and fro, the stock agent shrugged and said, "I can't give you a price unless I know how many sheep there are in your flock."<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">The farmer stood quite still, and stared down the valley. After about a minute he turned to the agent. "Eight thousand, four hundred and twenty six".<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">"How on earth did you manage that?" gasped the stunned stock agent.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">"Easy. I counted all the legs and divided by four."<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-64424637932198868522010-05-10T17:53:00.000-07:002010-05-10T17:53:21.993-07:00Defender<div class="MsoPlainText">Defender was an early arcade video game, of the generation after the original space invaders, which involved being a pilot in a small star fighter flying over a planet trying to rescue little sticky things and avoiding a host of more or less aggressive beasty things which are trying to kill you. One has a number of tools at ones disposal, including a laser cannon that makes an impressive sound and fires a stream of annihilation (far more satisfying than the little pellets emitted in space invaders), a limited supply of smart bombs which blow up all bad guys on the screen but don't harm the good guys, and the ability to randomly jump into hyperspace if things were getting really tricky (a move of last resort, as you have no idea how sticky the place would be where you wound up) <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">As such Defender was, and remains, one of the best sources of neat metaphors for the vicissitudes of life (but is still not as good on that score as <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/cricket.html">cricket</a>).<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-53909992729761206132010-05-10T17:50:00.000-07:002010-05-10T17:50:42.060-07:00Cricket<div class="MsoPlainText">Cricket is a game with no practical interest or utility save as a metaphor for our grim, tenuous grip on life on this planet, in all its forms and with all its varieties. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">People who don't understand the metaphorical power of cricket (and there are plenty of them), or who view it simply as game played between spells of rain over a period of weeks by people wearing old fashioned tennis gear are prone to writing it off as utterly pointless, long-winded and boring. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">"Ahh," says the cricket connoisseur, well-practiced in cynical ruminations on the meaning of his own existence, "but isn't that exactly the point!"</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Cricket is therefore always a rich and handy source of metaphors in business life, some of which have made it to <a href="http://wordsoffinance.blogspot.com/2010/05/buzzwords.html">buzzword </a>status and some, sadly, to the less august level of mere clichés. Those ones you simply have to play with a straight bat.<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-51191012941220613322010-05-09T09:56:00.000-07:002011-08-24T14:56:20.885-07:00Buzzwords<div class="MsoPlainText">Buzzwords are pet words and phrases, beloved of their employers, resented by everyone else. A significant cause of Management Speak, unchecked (and possibly unwittingly exacerbated) by the best efforts of campaigners such as the Financial Times' <a href="http://www.ft.com/comment/columnists/lucykellaway">Lucy Kellaway</a> to stamp them out.<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Buzzwords come in various forms:</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><i>Technical buzzwords</i>, while often entirely well-intentioned, are basically meant to make what you do sound hard. They are usually expressions which have no meaning outside the rarified heights of a given profession or calling, and little inside it. Latinisms, commonly found in legal documents, are a good example. Some achieve greatness by ubiquity: <i>mutatis mutandis</i> is employed with uncommon regularity in any contract or letter despite most lawyers having little conception what it means (which turns out to be not so bad, as it doesn't really mean anything). Indeed, Latinisms abound: <i>ceteris paribus</i>, <i>ipso facto</i>, <i>inter alia</i>, <i>prima facie</i> and so on, and provide joy only to those who aren't confident that their own language is capable of expressing concepts of general application. Tiring and pretentious.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><i>"Hip" buzzwords</i> (the inverted commas are important) are phrases that are meant to make what you do sound cool. Well, it's almost too ridiculous for words, isn't it. Would that it were so. But we all know it is true. "Hip" buzzwords are the most commonly encountered and heavily resented forms of buzzword. Because of their inherently transitory nature they tend to be auxiliary buzzwords but some of the more redoubtable examples have made it to core buzzword status.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Some examples: <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"></div><ul><li>"To drill down".</li>
<li>"To circle the wagons".</li>
<li>"To sing from the same hymn sheet".</li>
<li>"blue sky thinking".</li>
<li>"To cut to the chase".</li>
<li>Any sporting reference, eg, "we are approaching the end zone", or "who is going to quarterback the hiring process?"</li>
</ul><o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">We all do it, or spend a long and bitter career nursing resentful thoughts about undeserved underachievement. It is difficult to expound the common theme which runs through the coinage of successful buzzwordery of this category, but it seems to involve metaphors which invoke the exotic, the romantic, or the masculine (for example the examples cited above call up images of oil prospecting, the wild west and, um, going to church) since, as we all know, the practice of law and finance is perhaps the most dry and emasculating pursuit ever devised, which is why people get paid so much to do it. (It plays into the hands of the preternaturally emasculated, of course, which in turn leads to the Geek Paradox but that is a different story). <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><i>Phrases that are meant to be funny</i>: Such as "career-limiting behaviour". What these really demonstrate is how little importance is placed on a developed sense of humour in the financial markets. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">The is some convergence of buzzwords across otherwise unrelated disciplines, which suggests some buzzwords have a memetic or evolutionary power which can't be explained purely in terms of the buzzword paradox: For example, almost every sport, no matter how obscure (curling, mountain biking, jetboat racing) or lacking in actual skill or the expenditure of energy (luge riding, ten-pin bowling) as well as your common or garden sports like football and tennis, has devised expressions like "deep", "short", "long", "backhand", "inside", "outside" and "short backward square". <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">There are advantages and, of course, pitfalls of heavily using buzzwords.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><br />
</div><div class="MsoPlainText">Firstly,the continued prevalence of buzzword can be (only) explained by the strong career-evolutionary advantages they offer to a sophisticated user. Their skilful deployment can at the same time impress, delight, bamboozle and intimidate different sectors of the same audience in a way which is of uniform</div><div class="MsoPlainText"> benefit to the speaker, and in this way operate rather like smart bombs in the old video game Defender; accruing maximum points and clearing out all dangerous objects in a single stroke. </div><div class="MsoPlainText">On the other hand, there is a risk of inadvertent double entendre: At the same time, used carelessly or with insufficient acumen they can prove career limiting, embarrassing and lame. A buzzword is a form of dead (or at least terminally ill) metaphor, and involves assigning a novel meaning to a word or phrase in conventional use in another (usually more exotic) context. As such, buzzwords share many characteristics with double entendres, which also involve assigning a novel (naughty) meaning to a commonly used phrase. Many of the contexts from which buzzwords are appropriated are specifically masculine endeavours, and this raises the risk of inadvertent double entendre. One needs to be careful, for example, into what (and especially whom) one offers to drill down.</div><div class="MsoPlainText">There are also hidden dangers in using Compound Buzzwords which, if not carefully managed, may lead to embarrassingly mixed metaphors.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-13707599645079567892010-05-09T09:53:00.000-07:002010-05-09T09:53:23.963-07:00Buzzword Bingo<div class="MsoPlainText">Buzzword Bingo is a much talked about, seldom seen, parlour game allegedly played by disenchanted participants on conference calls and in business meetings, the object of which is to humiliate the person most egregiously using buzzwords, by standing up and shouting "BINGO!" at a point (usually not defined) when this behaviour is considered to have gone on long enough, the implication being, of course, that you have a "card" marked with buzzwords, and the speaker has used all of them. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Of course, Buzzword Bingo never <i>really </i>gets played, because everyone knows that to get on in this world you have to use Buzzwords; the more you use the better (ceteris paribus) you'll get on, and therefore the less prudent it is for others (who, in order to be playing, one must assume, will use fewer buzzwords and ipso facto will be further down the food chain) to make fun of you. Because that would be career-limiting behaviour. </div><div class="MsoPlainText">This observation is part of the Buzzword Paradox, advanced to explain the ongoing prevalance of ridiculous figurative language in the financial markets.<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-54058651140057222392010-05-09T09:49:00.000-07:002010-05-09T09:49:18.904-07:00The lost tribes of Microsoft Office<div class="MsoPlainText">There is a branch of software anthropology which categorises office workers by reference to the Microsoft application through which they understand the world. This provides a fascinating application of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Structure-Scientific-Revolutions-Thomas-Kuhn/dp/1443255440?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Kuhnian paradigm</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=1443255440" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" /> (and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Species-150th-Anniversary/dp/0451529065?ie=UTF8&tag=inco03-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Darwinian</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=inco03-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=0451529065" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" />) theory to office life and software usage. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">The theory goes that different individuals, doing different roles, become familiar with - and develop an early dependency on - a different "host" application. For example: <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"></div><ul><li>a legal clerk will mostly use Microsoft Word or Outlook.</li>
<li>a financial structurer or trader will mostly use Microsoft Excel.</li>
<li>a salesperson or a middle manager will learn their trade through the prism of Microsoft PowerPoint.</li>
</ul><o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">In a relatively short time, this inclination will develop into a full-blown dependency, to the point where the host application plays an active formative role in the worker's intellectual and technical development. As such the dependency will become increasingly hard to de-program (though there are generally accepted methods of doing this) and, in a broader timescale, the worker's thus-formulated needs will formative in the ongoing development of the application: a positive feedback loop of epic proportions). <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">As a result workers of the different persuasions (or "tribes") will adapt their own "host" applications in extraordinary ways to do their bidding - an Excel wizard will somehow contort a spreadsheet until it functions as a word processor, or a flow diagram generator. Powerpoint experts will communicate with a different vocabulary altogether, and will tend to see almost everything in the world in terms of a Gantt chart.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText">Needless to say, interesting situations develop when hotly loyal tribal members then interact.<o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-10635567424878240052010-05-09T09:23:00.000-07:002010-05-10T18:05:14.980-07:00PowerpointMicrosoft PowerPoint is the market standard software package on which seminar presentations are generated. (a presentation, or "deck", is a particular form of animated document generated in PowerPoint and inflicted on powerless underlings which promises much and delivers little, especially in the hands of a gifted speaker of management speak.)<br />
<div class="MsoPlainText">But you knew that already. More interesting is PowerPoint's central role in the linguistic development of management speak. PowerPoint is, for example, almost solely responsible for development in management speak of a character set comprises not just the traditional Roman alphabet used in Indo-European languages but also the lexicon of wingdings, pull-outs, bullets and animated transitions available in management speak-compatible (and enabling) applications like PowerPoint. This makes management speak sort of like base sixteen to ordinary English's decimal; an illegitimate off-spring of the Indo-European linguistic tradition and the first genuinely new dialect to emerge since the development of Latin five thousand years ago.</div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p>Adeptness at PowerPoint, the willingness to tinker around to get snappy slide transitions and the like, is a core skill of an aspiring middle manager (and a quick way to pick up the fundamental syntax of management speak). Those having a black belt in PowerPoint form one of the classic business worker archetypes - the lost tribes of Microsoft Office. </o:p><br />
<o:p>PowerPoint experts themselves fall into two clans: salespeople on one hand, and middle managers on the other. Their respective uses of PowerPoint are markedly different (though in both cases the chief objective is to obfuscate: Salespeople use PowerPoint to sell things; middle managers use PowerPoint to overwhelm, confuse, distract or otherwise simply justify their own existence. </o:p></div><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66790807235111922.post-55298835118489482332010-05-09T09:12:00.000-07:002010-05-09T09:24:33.823-07:00Microsoft Word<div class="MsoPlainText">Microsoft word is the "home application" for those billions of people in the world who don't really like software applications but are forced, by the need to put food on the table, to use them. Microsoft Word is therefore the personification of a necessary evil, and in the business world its adherents make up the smallest of the lost tribes of Microsoft. </div><div class="MsoPlainText">A paradox associated with Microsoft Word is that, no matter how clever it becomes, (and these days it's pretty clever - I mean, they've even got the auto-numbering to work) 80% of the people who use it aren't up to anything smarter than changing the font size, so its functionality goes untouched. These are the same people who hit the return key fifty times to get to a new page, would consider entering a manual page break to be incredibly smart and can't even conceive of the idea that you could build a page break into a paragraph style, largely because they can't conceive of the idea of a "paragraph style" at all.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p>In the business world, the sorts of people who belong to the "Microsoft word" tribe tend to reside in the legal department. They would never use Excel, even if their lives depended on it, and are innately (and correctly) suspicious of anyone bearing a PowerPoint presentation, and anything contained in it. </o:p></div><div class="MsoPlainText"><o:p></o:p></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18050738279435149377noreply@blogger.com0